The Court rejected this argument, emphasizing the inherently religious nature of the readings. Here, the school districts argued that, while the readings were religious, they fostered good morals, which is a secular goal. A Law may also not advance any particular religion or hinder the practice of any religion. The Court reasoned that, to avoid violation of the Establishment Clause, legislation must serve a legitimate secular purpose. This extends to the government favoring any religion as well. The Establishment Clause prohibits the establishment of a religion by the federal, and through the Fourteenth Amendment any state, government. Justice Clark, writing for the Court, ruled that such mandatory readings violate the First Amendment, specifically the Establishment Clause, through the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court consolidated two cases which involved mandatory reading of religious scripture as part of the curriculum in a public school. Supreme Court case holding that mandatory religious activity as part of a public school’s curriculum, such as Bible readings and the recitation of the Lord's Prayer, violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |